>Russian government hackers penetrated the computer network of the Democratic National Committee and gained access to the entire database of opposition research on GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump, according to committee officials and security experts who responded to the breach.

>The intruders so thoroughly compromised the DNC’s system that they also were able to read all email and chat traffic, said DNC officials and the security experts.

>The intrusion into the DNC was one of several targeting American political organizations. The networks of presidential candidates Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump were also targeted by Russian spies, as were the computers of some Republican political action committees, U.S. officials said. But details on those cases were not available.

>Some of the hackers had access to the DNC network for about a year, but all were expelled over the past weekend in a major computer cleanup campaign, the committee officials and experts said.

"Russian government hackers penetrated DNC, stole opposition research on Trump"
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/russian-government-hackers-penetrated-dnc-stole-opposition-research-on-trump/2016/06/14/cf006cb4-316e-11e6-8ff7-7b6c1998b7a0_story.html

>The Russian government allegedly hacked the Democratic National Committee, stealing the sum of the organization’s opposition research on Donald Trump. Surely this means we’ve officially entered the age where American elections can be heavily influenced by hackers, right?

>But outside of reporting the fact that it happened, no high-profile politicians have yet tried to use this as political leverage yet. Trump hasn’t tweeted about Crooked Hillary and her cronies not being able to lock down her computer systems. The Republicans haven’t complained about the DNC compiling a treasure trove of research to use against Trump. Basically, no one has said anything. Are we so sick of hacking that we don’t really care that a state-sponsored hacker breached the offices of a major political party during a hotly contested presidential debate?

>I called up a few experts in opposition research and in cybersecurity, who told me that the hack really, actually doesn’t seem to be that big of a deal. Not because it wasn’t sophisticated or because Russia didn’t steal a lot of data (the Post reports that it had access for almost a year), but because the nature of this campaign is so weird that this just seems to be another little blip.

"So a Major Political Party Got Hacked by the Russian Government. Now What?"
http://motherboard.vice.com/read/dnc-hacked-by-russia-now-what

El comité dijo que no hubo información personal, financiera ni de donantes involucrada, ni otros documentos secretos, pero a las 24 horas después apareció el hacker, bajo el nick Guccifer2, denunció que esto era falso y publicó una lista de los donantes del partido demócrata, además de un documento secreto de cuando Hillary era secretaria de Estado. Aprovechó de decir que entregó todos los documentos a WikiLeaks y que ellos pronto los publicarán, lo que explica por qué hace unos días Julian Assange dijo que "el próximo leak tendrá suficiente evidencia para procesar a Clinton, aunque no ocurrirá porque el FBI va a ignorarlo."

Guccifer2 usó la plataforma WordPress para hablar acerca de lo que hizo, además de dejar varios documentos listos para ser descargados para respaldar sus dichos.
↓
https://guccifer2.wordpress.com/2016/06/15/dnc/