>>8
Pfft, si fuera así de simple Bill Gates o Stephen Hawking no estarían diciendo que desarrollar una inteligencia artificial puede ser el mayor error de la humanidad.

>Many simple tricks have been proposed that would ‘solve’ the whole AI control problem. Examples include programming the ASI in such a way that it wants to please humans, or that it function merely as a human tool. Alternately, we could integrate a concept, like love or respect, into its source code. And to prevent it from adopting a hyper-simplistic, monochromatic view of the world, it could be programmed to appreciate intellectual, cultural, and social diversity.
>But these solutions are either too simple—like trying to fit the entire complexity of human likes and dislikes into a single glib definition—or they cram all the complexity of human values into a simple word, phrase, or idea. Take, for example, the tremendous difficulty of trying to settle on a coherent, actionable definition for “respect.”
>That’s not to say that such simple tricks are useless—many of them suggest good avenues of investigation, and could contribute to solving the ultimate problem, but we can’t rely on them without a lot more work developing them and exploring their implications.
- Stuart Armstrong de Future of Humanity Institute